Connecticut's
New State Capitol
By
David M. Roth
The
Connecticut State Capitol in Hartford, an impressive building
of marble and granite on grounds overlooking Bushnell Park, reflects
the pride with which Connecticuters regard the state's rich historical
heritage. Via tympana, medallions, and statues, the Capitol celebrates
the achievements of such Connecticut worthies as the Reverend
Thomas Hooker (c. 1586-1647), Governor John Winthrop, Jr. (1605/1606-1676),
Roger Sherman (1721-1793), Revolutionary War Governor Jonathan
Trumbull (1710-1785), Noah Webster (1758-1843), General Joseph
Hawley (1826-1905), Civil War Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles
(1802-1878), and United States Senator Orville Hitchcock Platt
(1827-1905). The building's distinctive dome is encircled by twelve
statues which represent Agriculture, Commerce, Education, Music,
Science, and Force. While in the 1980's the Connecticut State
Capitol is accordingly viewed as a classic structure in the state's
historical and architectural heritage, an irony is that the building
was located in Hartford and constructed only during and after
furious controversies.
Connecticut
had two capitals—Hartford and New Haven—from the 1660s when the
Colony of New Haven—was integrated into Connecticut. The Connecticut
General Assembly sat in each city every second year, in New Haven
meeting in an Ithiel Town (1784-1844) building (c. 1830) that
resembled a Greek temple and in Hartford meeting at the Old State
House (1796) designed by Charles Bulfinch (1763-1844). By the
mid-nineteenth century, with Connecticut's governmental functions
expanding in the face of industrialization and urbanization,
the
two-capital arrangement came to be viewed as anachronistic. Unfortunately,
the growing resolution to end the arrangement was complicated
because of competition between New Haven and Hartford to become
the state's sole capital.
The
competition moved toward a climax in the early 1870s. In 1870
Hartford offered the State of Connecticut $500,000 toward the
building of a Hartford Capitol. The state's voters declared a
winner in the contest by a referendum in 1873. Hartford won with
some 37,000 votes to 31,000 for New Haven, with only New Haven
and Fairfield counties strongly supporting New Haven. With Hartford's
selection, the City of Hartford was authorized by the General
Assembly to issue $1,000,000 in bonds to meet its financial responsibilities
regarding the new Capitol. Hartford subsequently purchased Trinity
College (which established its new campus on Hartford's Gallows
Hill) and donated the site for the Capitol. The resolution of
the Hartford-New Haven competition was not, however, the end of
controversy.
Even
more acrimony developed during the construction of the new Capitol.
The two architects who dominated the considerations of the Board
of Commissioners charged by the General Assembly to oversee the
construction of the Capitol were James G. Batterson and Richard
M. Upjohn.
James
G. Batterson (1823-1901) operated a cemetery monument yard and
marble and granite importing business in Hartford. Although his
monument business prospered greatly with the barrage of monument
orders during and after the Civil War, Batterson desperately sought
to become a leading builder. He hired George Keller (1842-1935),
a man who would eventually be known as Hartford's leading nineteenth-century
architect, and submitted a Batterson-Keller plan for the new Capitol.
Richard M. Upjohn (1827-1903) was a respected New York City architect
who had a reputation in Hartford as a result of his designs used
for the Park Church (1867), the West Middle School (completed,
1873), and a High Victorian Gothic home on Forest Street built
for Charles Boardman Smith (1870). Upjohn's plans for the Capitol
were chosen by the Rosin of Commissioners in April 1872, apparently
putting an end to the Batterson (Keller)-Upjohn competition. Such,
however, was not to be the case.
Drawing
upon apparently strong political support in the General Assembly,
Batterson succeeded in having himself appointed contractor
by
the Board of Commissioners to build Upjohn's building, but Batterson,
of course, had no intention of simply building Upjohn's building.
Indeed, during the construction phase of the Capitol from 1872
to 1879, Batterson did everything he could to have Upjohn dropped
as architect, to have a new Batterson design substituted, and,
having failed in these attempts, to alter significantly the
Upjohn
design and to construct the building with little consultation
with the Board of Commissioners' appointed construction superintendent.
The tale of Batterson's intrigues is far too complex for brief
summation, but Batterson did succeed in altering the Upjohn
design
significantly, and, in the course of that effort, to have effected
a cost increase of the project from under $1,000,000 to over
$2,500,000.
It should also be noted that it has been said that the Batterson "modifications" improved upon the Upjohn design—by,
for example, including the now-famous dome.
In
any case, one conclusion to be reached is that an account of
the
location and construction of the new State Capitol for "the
Land of Steady Habits" includes little "steadiness."
For
Further Reading
Curry,
David Park and Pierce, Patricia Dawes, eds. Monument: The Connecticut
State Capitol. Hartford, 1979.
Ransom,
David F. "James 0. Batterson and the New State House."
The Connecticut Historical Society Bulletin, 45 (January
1980), 1-15.
*
Entry under revision.
|