Disestablishment

The disestablishment of the Congregational church has been discussed above, in the section on the Constitution of 1818. The central published work there is Richard Purcell’s Connecticut in Transition. Relevant works not cited elsewhere:

Coons, Paul Wakeman. The Achievement of Religious Liberty in Connecticut. Tercente­nary pamphlet LX (1936). Greene, Purcell, and others are available and better. But this is only thirty-two pages long.

Dreisbach, Daniel L. "'Sowing Useful Truths and Principles': The Danbury Baptists, Thomas Jefferson, and the 'Wall of Separation'," Journal of Church and State. 39 (Summer, 1997) 455-501. The "Petition" is printed as an appendix to vol. XI of the Public Records of the State.

Gerardi, Donald F. "Zephaniah Swift and Connecticut's Standing Order: Skepticism, Conservatism, and Religious Liberty in the Early Republic," 67 (June, 1994) 234-56.  This article deals with Swift's high Federalism and deism by describing the rationalist context of Swift's Yale years and Revolutionary intellectual currents. Gerardi's object is to explain the "apparently incongruous alliance of rationalists and pietists" in the post-War era that in Connecticut -- as in other states -- led to the disestablishment of churches. How could the deist Swift also favor public support for religion? Gerardi takes at face value Ezra Stile's remark in 1794 that among the forty lawyers nominated to stand for the Council, one-third were Revelationhists, one-third Deists, one-third doubtful. (Lit Dia III: 546.) It seems unlikely that this division reflects the population as a whole, of course, But deists supported public morality and often saw the church as the bulwark of that.

Reardon, John J. “Religious and Other Factors in the Defeat of the Standing Order in Connecticut, 1800-1818.” Historical Magazine of the Protestant Episcopal Church 30(June, 1961)2:93-110. An analysis of the issues, with emphasis on the influence of the “Establishment” in maintaining Federalism, not just as a party, but as a creed, until 1817. Reardon quotes Lyman Beecher: “On election day they had a festival all the [Congregational] clergy used to go, walk in proces­sion, smoke pipes and drink. And, fact is, when they got together they would talk over who should be governor.... etc, and their councils would prevail.” (p. 96. The quotation is from Lyman Beecher’s Autobiography. 1:259).

Just to demonstrate that the matter of church organization is still alive—if not well—in Connecticut, see Marcel Garsaud,Jr., “Ecclesiasti­cal Societies and Church Corporations—A Proposal for Change,” in Connecticut Bar Journal 41(September, 1967)3:402-25. The first fourteen pages are historical. The rest deals with the situation as of 1965. An excel­lent summary of the legal questions involved.

 

©2003 CT Heritage. Designed and Hosted by The Computer Company Inc