The Anglican Church
Of all the dissenting sects in Connecticut, the
most studied is the English Establishment, the Anglicans
or, after 1784, the Episcopalians. The literature here is huge,
and was listed in Nelson Burr’s “Inventory of the Church Archives
of Connecticut, Protestant Episcopal” (New Haven: Connecticut
Records Survey of the W.P.A., 1940), which includes capsule
histories of all Anglican or Episcopal parishes. This mimeographed
work
was sponsored by the State Library and is catalogued under Connecticut
Records Survey. One reason the literature about Anglicans is
so
great is the efforts of Kenneth Walter Cameron, who has edited
and published some fifteen volumes of materials relating to Connecticut
Anglicanism and Episcopalianism under the imprint of Transcendental
Books, in Hartford. Many of these volumes are church history
and
documentary collections, which are not included in this bibliography.
Cameron also published under the Transcendental Books imprint Anglicanism in Early Connecticut and New England: A Selective
Bibliography (1977).
Beardsley, E. Edwards, The History of the Episcopal
Church in Connecticut From the Settlement of the Colony to the
Death of Bishop Seabury. New York: Hurd and Houghton, 1865.
Beardsley, William Agur. The Life of Eben Edwards
Beardsley, Connecticut Churchman and Ecclesiastical Historian
(1808-1891). Edited by Kenneth Walter Cameron. Hartford: Transcendental
Books, 1976; originally published in 1883.
Burr, Nelson R. The Story of the Diocese of
Connecticut: A New Branch of the Vine. Hartford: Church Missions
Pub. Co., 1962.
Cameron, Kenneth Walter. The Anglican Episcopate
in Connecticut (1784-1899): A Sheaf of Biographical and Institutional
Studies of Churchmen and Historians with Early Ecclesiastical
Documents. Hartford: Transcendental Books, 1976.
Connecticut Diocese of the Episcopal Church. The
Jarvis Centenary. New Haven: the Diocese, 1897. A life of
Bishop Jarvis and a history of the Church in Connecticut.
Hart, Samuel. Old Connecticut: Historical Papers
on ... Anglicanism. Reprinted by Transcendental Books,
1976.
Hawks, Francis L., and Perry, William Stevens,
eds. Documentary History of the Protestant Episcopal Church
in Connecticut, 1704-1789. 1863; reedited by Kenneth Walter
Cameron and reprinted by Transcendental Books, 1976.
Kinloch, Hector G. L. M. “Anglican Clergy in Connecticut,
1701-1785.” Doctoral dissertation, Yale, 1960. The Society for
the Propagation of the Gospel was established in 1701, and from
that date to 1785, when the Episcopal church was founded, forty-five
missionary-clergy of the church of England served in Connecticut.
This-study also attends to forty-seven other Anglican leaders.
Kinloch’s study reveals the creation and molding of an essentially
American religious denomination within a framework of disintegrating
New England Calvinism.
Jarvis, Lucy Cushing, ed. Sketches
of Church Life in Colonial Connecticut: Being the Story of
the Transplanting
of the Church of England into Forty-Two Parishes of Connecticut.
New Haven: Tuttle, Morehouse and Taylor, 1902; repr. in Cameron,
Anglicanism, listed above.
O’Neil, Maud. “A Struggle-for
Religious Liberty: An Analysis of the Work of the S.P.G. in
Connecticut [1706-1818].”
Historical Magazine of the Protestant Episcopal Church 20(June,
1951): 17 3-89. O’Neil wrote a doctoral dissertation
on Samuel Peters. This piece is descriptive.
Ricketts, Rowland, Jr. “John Bliss: Congregational
Anglican.” CHS Bulletin 42(July, 1977)3:65-72. Bliss (1690-1737,
Yale 1710), was the Congregational minister in Hebron who converted
himself and a small portion of his congregation to Anglicanism.
Seymour, Origen Storrs. The Beginnings of the
Episcopal Church in Connecticut. Tercentenary pamphlet
XXX (1934). Seymour, a lawyer, was Chancellor of the Church
in Connecticut.
Steiner, Bruce E. “Anglican Officeholding
in Pre-Revolutionary Connecticut:
The Parameters of New England
Community.” William
and Mary Quarterly. 3rd series 31(July, 1974)3:369-406. Anglicans
held political and civil office, especially on the local level,
much more frequently than has been believed. Steiner counted
the
offices and got his wife to draw a marvelous map showing where
they were in 1774.
—Connecticut Anglicans in the Revolutionary
Era: A Study in Community Tensions. Bicentennial pamphlet
XXVIII (1978). Steiner shows that Anglican laymen— there were
thousands of them—were well integrated into Connecticut society,
not much persecuted during the War, and quickly re-integrated
in the 1780s. See his excellent “Guide to Additional Reading” in
the back.
—”New England Anglicanism: A Genteel
Faith?” William
and Mary Quarterly. 3rd series 27(January, 1970)1:122-35.
Steiner demonstrates that, contrary to previously prevailing
wisdom, Anglicans constituted a cross section of Connecticut
society,
not a collection of the wealthy.
Tucker, Louis Leonard. “The Church
of England and Religious Liberty at Pre-Revolutionary Yale.” William and
Mary Quarterly 3rd series 17(July, 1960)3:314-28. Deals with
President Clap’s efforts in 1765 to make Anglican students conform
to Yale Congregational polity or get out. The students wrote to
the SPG in London, and shortly Clap’s efforts ceased. Tucker is
the author of a biography of Clap.
Villers, David H. "Connecticut
Anglicanism and Society to 1783: A Review of the Historians," Historical
Magazine of the Protestant Episcopal Church 53 (March, 1984)
1: 45-59. A survey from Peters through Bancroft and up to Steiner
and Kinloch. Villers traces treatment of Anglicans from the monolithic
consensus of Bancroft who ignored them, to the work of Kinloch
and Steiner who integrate them into Connecticut society, only
excepting 1774-1784. The Progressive interregnum, Villers says,
was built on reading back into the Colonial period the isolation
of Anglicans during the Revolution. Thus Progressive historians
portrayed them as an isolated subculture from the beginnings of
the S.P.G. in 1701 to the Constitution of 1818.
Weaver, Glenn. “Anglican-Congregational
Tensions in Pre-Revolutionary Connecticut.” Historical Magazine of the
Protestant Episcopal Church 26(1957)269-85. Weaver, a pioneer
among modern historians in the field, perceived the tensions that
Steiner believes were not so great.
|